NewMoneyMoves
PerspectivesResearchTerminalsWeekend RWABoard
VIEW
InsightEditorialAdd a viewContextThesisReadingOutlook
››Thematic Deep-Dive
EDITORIAL VIEW

The Place Memory Took — Vera Rubin Rewrites the Data Center BOM

Within a VR200 NVL72 rack at $7.8M, memory takes 25.6% — the "HBM 15.5%" proposition evolves into "memory 25.6%"

HHaelangdal·Founder AnalystMay 23, 202622 min readThematic Deep-Dive
NewMoneyMoves

Global Investment through Themes

Content

ThemesIdeasReportsEarnings

Explore

GuideETFsPerspectivesTelegramNVIDIA PortfolioWeekly ReviewCredit & Leverage

Community

Daily News

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDisclaimer

© 2026 NewMoneyMoves. All rights reserved.

Bottom Line

The data center BOM proposition has evolved. Within a VR200 NVL72 rack at $7.8M, memory takes 25.6% — 2.7x wider than GB300's 9.4%. HBM4 + LPDDR5X together dramatically widen memory's revenue ceiling, with SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics as the primary players filling it. But the ceiling is potential, not a guarantee.

Reader's Brief — 30-second TL;DR

Advanced
Why Now

VR200 first shipment in Q3 2026 · full ramp in Q4. NVIDIA Q1 FY27 revenue $81.6B + Q2 guide $91B triple beat (5/20). KOSPI +8.42% on 5/21 — record single-session point gain at 7,815.59 — markets validating the proposition live.

Winners ?? Losers

Primary beneficiaries — SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics (HBM4 dual supply · LPDDR5X Samsung-led). Substrate ecosystem — Daeduck Electronics (27F P/E ~26x, relative undervaluation), Isu Petasys (high-layer PCB), Samsung Electro-Mechanics (FCBGA + MLCC + LTA). Japan-controlled single points of failure — Nittobo (T-glass 80%) and Ajinomoto (ABF 95%+). Risks — VR200 ramp timing, HBM4 pricing, near-term overheating after the +8.42% session on 5/21.

Watch For

Reading depth
  1. 011. The BOM Revision — What ChangedThe rack price doubled, but within it the space memory takes has widened 2.7x.Jump to section
  2. 022. The $2.0M Memory Bill — HBM4 + LPDDR5XThe memory surge is a composition change. HBM4's 20.7 TB plus Vera CPU's 54 TB LPDDR5X, as LPDDR enters data centers, pushing memory's share to 25.6%.Jump to section
  3. 033. Evolution of the Proposition — From HBM 15.5% to Memory 25.6%From HBM-only analysis to memory-wide analysis — the resolution of the diagnostic tool just went up.Jump to section
  4. 044. Allocation of the $2.0M Memory BillExpanded to a memory thesis, the picture shifts from SK-heavy to two-maker balance: HBM4 dual, LPDDR5X Samsung-led, both taking most of the $2.0M bill.Jump to section
  5. 055. The Path of Progress — As the BOM Ceiling Rises, Progress FallsThe largest gap between progress and valuation sits with memory.Jump to section
  6. 066. The Hidden Bottleneck — Substrate and Component EcosystemPCB, MLCC, ABF are under 2% of BOM, but their growth trails only memory, and without them the other 98% stops. BOM share and bottleneck strength differ.Jump to section
  7. 077. Market Context — May 21, 2026One day in which the market priced the BOM proposition — yet +8.42% being a record gain also signals near-term overheating.Jump to section
  8. 088. Conclusion — The Place Memory TookMemory is now the firm second axis after GPU. The BOM ceiling widens the memory industry's revenue ceiling 2.7x, and HBM4 plus LPDDR5X benefit both makers.Jump to section

1. The BOM Revision — What Changed

Start with the new data exactly as Morgan Stanley estimated it (April 2026).

<Chart 1> NVL72 rack BOM comparison — GB300 vs VR200

Item-by-item change

GPU rose from $2,520,000 to $3,960,000 — a 57% increase, about $55,000 per GPU. It remains the most expensive single line item. But its share of the rack fell from 63.1% to 50.7%.

Memory is the lead story of this revision. From $373,939 to $2,001,600 — +435%. Of the $3.8M total rack increase, memory accounted for $1.63M, or 43% — more than the GPU's $1.44M increase.

Networking also surged. NVLink Switch +122%, other networking +121%. PCB +233%, MLCC +182%, substrate +82%. As electrical complexity exploded, substrate and passive component costs jumped together.

CPU was flat at $180,000. Cooling rose only 12% and power 32%. These are the items whose shares shrank.

<Chart 2> VR200 cost change rate by item

Total and shares

VR200 NVL72 rack total: $7,803,148 — a 95% increase from GB300's $3,994,551. Effectively doubled.

The share structure shifted. GPU 50.7%, memory 25.6%, others 8.0%, networking 9.2%, CPU 2.3%, remainder 4.2%. GPU sits just above half; memory occupies a quarter.

<Chart 3> BOM share change — memory from 9.4% to 25.6%

The rack price doubled, but within it the space memory takes has widened 2.7x.

Takeaway

The rack price doubled, but within it the space memory takes has widened 2.7x.

Full access requires 🥉 Bronze tier

Sign in with Google — your tier will be checked automatically and access granted if eligible.

Sign in with Google

This site runs on ads — the tier system rewards community contributions.

Comments

This report is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Investment decisions should be made based on your own judgment and responsibility. The analysis and opinions contained herein are based on information available at the time of writing and are subject to change.

All Reports
Home
Perspectives
Company
Macro
Theme