NewMoneyMoves
PerspectivesResearchTerminalsWeekend RWABoard
MACRO
RatesMacroRead the flowLiquidityCommoditiesPolicyGeopolitics
››Macro Strategy
MACRO OUTLOOK

Haelangdal Market View — 2026 Is Not 2022

The Reality Behind TurboQuant Panic, Pressure for Early Iran War Exit, and Why You Should Buy Stocks at Cheap Valuations

HHaelangdal·Founder AnalystMarch 31, 202625 min readMacro Strategy
Bottom Line

Market fears in 2026 are overblown — the TurboQuant shock is a misreading of incremental cache compression, early Iran war exit pressure and a structurally different inflation backdrop create a case for buying at depressed valuations.

NewMoneyMoves

Global Investment through Themes

Content

ThemesIdeasReportsEarnings

Explore

GuideETFsPerspectivesTelegramNVIDIA PortfolioWeekly ReviewCredit & Leverage

Community

Daily News

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDisclaimer

© 2026 NewMoneyMoves. All rights reserved.

Reader's Brief — 30-second TL;DR

Advanced
Why Now

Google's TurboQuant announcement triggered a memory semiconductor panic; simultaneously, the Iran-Hormuz risk and Fed policy uncertainty compounded market anxiety.

Winners ?? Losers

Beneficiaries — semiconductor and AI infrastructure assets acquired at compressed valuations. Headwinds — private credit and high-leverage companies, energy-import-dependent firms exposed to Hormuz disruption.

Watch For

Monthly US Core CPI (convergence toward 2.5% target) and Iran negotiation timeline — the two variables that determine the pace of market recovery.

Reading depth
  1. 01Current Market SituationFour weeks into the war, petrochemical feedstocks spiked to historic levels. Ethylene +80% and naphtha +81% triggered a force-majeure cascade, with Korea's Yeosu complex at its breaking point.Jump to section
  2. 02The Truth About TurboQuant PanicThe TurboQuant panic is an overreaction distorting the tech's scope. Cache compression touches only part of inference, not weights, training, or NAND, and Jevons' paradox raises consumption.Jump to section
  3. 032026 Is Not 20222026 is not 2022. Russia-Ukraine was a triple shock of energy, food, and shelter; the Iran war is a single energy channel. With core CPI at 2.5%, it is a relative-price move.Jump to section
  4. 04Pressure for US War ExitThe US has no choice but to push an Iran exit by April. The threat of Asian Treasury sales, the $1.7T private-credit fragility, and midterm pressure all converge on April.Jump to section
  5. 05Russia-Ukraine vs Iran-Israel War Comparison2026 is a 'bigger but narrower' shock than 2022. Supply loss at ~10% is about 3x larger, but with Iran no grain exporter and shelter cooling, the spillover is limited.Jump to section
  6. 06Market Implications & ImplicationsFind opportunity in fear. The TurboQuant panic repeats DeepSeek, and Micron at 10x and SK Hynix at 17x are historically cheap. One cache trick does not revise $700B of capex.Jump to section
  7. 07Risk Factors & DisclaimerThe risks to this thesis are renewed strikes after 4/6, follow-up memory-saving tech, a private-credit default cascade, and large Asian Treasury sales.Jump to section

Current Market Situation

Since the US-Israel joint strike on Iran commenced on February 28, 2026, the Hormuz Strait blockade has materialized, plunging global energy and petrochemical markets into severe disruption.

  1. 1.Petrochemical Feedstock Price Surge

Four weeks into the Iran conflict, petrochemical feedstocks across the board recorded historically unprecedented price spikes: -Ethylene (NE Asia): +80% ($1,280/t in 3 weeks — highest since April 2022) -Naphtha (Singapore/Korea): +74~81% (Korea $68.87 to $124.53/bbl) -Polymers average: +41~42%

  • Acrylic acid +106%, butadiene +82%, solvents +64%

Petrochemical Feedstock Price Surge (March)

Source: SunSirs, ICIS, Alkagesta (2026.3)
  1. 1.Asia's Naphtha Dependency and Supply Chain Collapse

60-70% of Asia's naphtha imports depend on the Middle East (via Hormuz). Korea imports 27 million tons of naphtha annually, 75% from the Middle East. By week 4 of the blockade, approximately 40% of Asian naphtha supply was cut off (LyondellBasell CEO), with 20% of global petrochemical capacity affected (Dow CEO).

  1. 1.Force Majeure Cascade

Supply disruptions immediately triggered operational shutdowns: -Yeochun NCC: Force Majeure declaration → LG Chem Plant 2 shutdown -Lotte Chemical Yeosu: Full operational halt -Sinopec: Naphtha cracker utilization dropped to 82.4% -Japan: 6 of 12 plants cut production; ethylene output 334,200t/month (all-time low) -Taiwan Formosa: Reviewing 4/1 supply contract default

  1. 1.Alternative Feedstock: US Shale Ethane

While naphtha-based crackers face crisis, US ethane-based production facilities are operating normally. US energy companies are outperforming the S&P 500, reaffirming the strategic value of energy self-sufficiency.

  1. 1.Russia-Ukraine vs Iran-Israel War Comparison

If the 2022 Russia-Ukraine war was a sanctions-based gradual supply reduction (3-4M BPD, ~3% of global supply), the 2026 Iran war represents a physical Hormuz blockade (8-10M BPD, ~10% of global supply) — a 3x larger, immediate shock. However, the critical difference is that 2022 was a triple shock (energy + food + shelter) while 2026 is a single-channel energy shock.

Takeaway

Four weeks into the war, petrochemical feedstocks spiked to historic levels. Ethylene +80% and naphtha +81% triggered a force-majeure cascade, with Korea's Yeosu complex at its breaking point.

Full access requires a free account

Sign in with Google to unlock the full body of every free report instantly.

Sign in with Google

This site runs on ads — the tier system rewards community contributions.

Comments

This report is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Investment decisions should be made based on your own judgment and responsibility. The analysis and opinions contained herein are based on information available at the time of writing and are subject to change.

All Reports
Home
Research
Company
Macro
Theme